28
Mallesons Shudders as Lawyers Consider Move to Gilbert + Tobin
Posted by The Spy | Posted in Firm Gossip, Gilbert & Tobin, Mallesons Stephen Jaques | Posted on 8.53am
Over the last 12 months we have at various times reported on rumours, received by us from anonymous sources, that 2010 would see a stunning exodus of lawyers from major Australian law firms. In particular, we reported that the firms who have stiffed junior lawyers over pay and threats of redundancy would see a considerably higher than normal rate of attrition.
We were not surprised to see those rumours refuted last week by AAR P&D director Susan Ferrier and Freehills HR director Gareth Bennett in an article published by our friends at Lawyers Weekly. There is nothing quite like planting a seed of doubt as to the prevalence of jobs in the market to allay employee motivation to depart. Astute media-watchers will note, of course, that economists were quoted confidently asserting in a Business Spectator article penned a mere 4 days prior to the Lawyers Weekly article that the “peak in unemployment has passed”.
So where will the exodus of lawyers go? Obviously, we cannot answer that question in every instance, but in the case of Mallesons, a firm we consider leader of the pack in terms of exodus potential (very low pay, apparently highest working hours), things just became a little clearer.
This from an anoymous Mallesons spy recently:
Mallesons partners must reconsider their current, stringent view on remuneration, the reported 44% profit margin, and they must do so quickly. I am presently considering a far more generous offer from Gilbert + Tobin to join its new Melbourne office and right now I see no compelling reason to stay at the firm. By market rates, my remuneration is appalling and a Red Balloon voucher, purchased en masse for a discount, does nothing fix the situation. Partners should be advised that things need to change, and quickly, or G+T might just land the entirety of Telstra’s work along with dozens of Mallesons lawyers.
As reported by AFR (11/12/09):
G+T managing partner Danny Gilbert snared a large chunk of Mallesons’ work from Telstra earlier this year after offering to provide unlimited advice for a fixed fee… G+T has appointed 5 new partners in the past 6 months, & its partnership has grown by 7.4%. G+T is also growing in geographic terms. It will open its first office in Melbourne soon. The move is client led - Telstra’s [general counsel] Will Irving is based there… Gilbert says … “Telstra was looking for a broader engagement with the firm across all of activites the firm has expertise in and we were looking for a fee arrangement that had the best prospect of expanding our connections across what is a very large corporation”.
The article goes on to mention more bad news for Mallesons:
G+T also announced last week it had convinced highly regarded private equity specialist [and former Mallesons partner] Peter Cook to join the firm.
Are you considering changing firms? If so, why?
Related posts
- Gilbert + Tobin, Telstra & the Fixed-Fee Billable Unit We reported last week the rumour that Mallesons might need...
- Gilbert + Tobin Set to Open Melbourne Office In a relatively harmless scoop usually reserved for our friends...
- A Dodgey, ‘Downcast’ ‘Emergency Situation’; The Knives Come Out For Gilbert + Tobin Since we reported a few weeks ago on the harbinger...
- Enter Gilbert & Tobin; What’s the Bloody Story Danny Boy? After trawling the spectrum of news publications for months in...
- Mallesons ‘Fail Jail’; Firm Restructure Gives Useless Lawyers a Second Chance In a Firm Spy exclusive, we can today report some...



Loading...
Firm Spy is always good for a laugh. If only you guys had the balls to apply the blow torch to Gilbert & Tobin the way you do to other firms. You read like a PR outfit for G&T. It’s not even subtle.
Susan Ferrier has no idea. Lawyer morale at Allens is at a critical low, people will flood to Freehills who are keenly making the most of this opportunity already. Freehills has positioned itself as the least tight of the top tiers of late. You can’t expect to institute the pay freeze first, be the last to unfreeze, make everyone take annual leave over the christmas break with only half a day on Christmas Eve as bonus leave (Mallesons aren’t even this tight), reveal potential dramatic remuneration restructure in Business Spectator article and continue to brag and strut about exceptional performance and client satisfaction, without fallout. A June/July pay review will be too little too late…but then again what do we expect from HR?
AFR reported (29/1/01) that Slater requires further investors and their average non-personal injury chargeable rates will increase from $250 to $260. I had to read this several times. I have very serious concerns for this public listed entity. At those rates - directors may be prosecuted for Insolvent Trading.