30
Our Millionth Hit & The Firm Spy Transparency Mission
Posted by The Spy | Posted in Law and disorder | Posted on 7.00am
We are about three weeks past of the anniversary date that the Firm Spy was temporarily shut down. We used to appear at www.firmspy.com.au, but had to start afresh at www.firmspy.com (without the .au).
Since that time, we have received well over one million hits on our site. 1,113,415 to be exact (as of 30/6/2010)
Every now and then we reflect on exactly what we are and what we’re trying to achieve. And now is probably as good a time as any to be reflective. Are we a gossip site? A blog? A news source? We don’t really know. However, we think for the most part, we are about trying to keep things as transparent as possible. This is paradoxical, given that we don’t reveal who we are, but we believe this is necessary in order to continue to report without the editorial bias that we see in competitor news media (excepting the AFR occasionally).
Our mission, if we have one, probably starts at univiersities - giving students a clearer picture of precisely what to expect after graduation. Many of our readers are university students. To this end, we read with interest the comments from two university students in an article forming part of the AFR Partnership Survey:
Third year Maquarie University law student Tanja Maley says she hopes to become a partner in a top commercial firm, and everything else - family included - can follow. “I want a fast city life and i want the long hours”, she says. “I don’t think I’d be satisfied if I wasn’t challenged in that respect.”
But fellow student Tahnee Nicholson says that after completing a clerkship at a top national firm and accepting a graduate position, she is concerned about the obstacles facing women. “One of the male partners said to me at one point: “You know, women partners have to sacrifice a lot more to get here than men do,” she says. Successful female partners are described as “ballsy and gutsy women”, she says. Nicholson still wants to become a partner and hopes that “by the time I get to that stage the things expected of a partner will have changed especially for female partners”.
But do students have any idea what being a partner at a major corporate law firm is really like? Sure, they probably know that the cash is good, but what about the day to day life of a partner? What about the isolation from family and friends? AFR Legal Affairs editors James Eyers and Hannah Low gave a fantastic - and in our view 100% correct - insight into the troubles that face partners who, probably feeling estranged from family and friends, decide they might want to temporarily work part time, or with less intensity:
A key reason why changing gears can be problematic is that the equity models of many law firms don’t respond to partners seeking to reduce the amount of profit they receive from the partnership, which is typically determined by allocating points. Even at the firms that have abandoned traditional lock-step equity structures for more performance-based models, reducing points is viewed as a sign of weakness.
Many firms struggle with such requests [to work part time]. It is well known in the industry that “part time” does not necessarily mean fewer hours will be worked. At many firms, part-time partners keep the same billing targets, meaning they have to squash a full-time workload into three or four days. For others, it can simply mean doing the same work from home yet be paid at the part-time rate.
Meanwhile, Dwyer Health consultant Ted Dwyer said that:
historically Australian firms have been unwilling to reduce levels of equity to accommodate flexible working arrangements. “There has been a tradition of de-equitising partners”, he says.
For our student readers thinking about the distant prospect of equity in a law firm, be careful what you wish for. The overwhelming likelihood is that you’ll never get there, but supposing you do, is the fundamentally shallow existence of growing old chained to a desk all that alluring? What about for $1,500,000.00 per year?
But we digress. Today is a celebration of the Firm Spy’s arrival, and let’s not sully it more talk about the corporate partners who feature so prominently in all of our other publications.
Many moons ago, we made the following statement which appears on our “about us“ page:
Because we are professionals ourselves, we know what it’s like, and we have our ear to the ground for the latest gossip and news you won’t hear anywhere else. So beware: you are being watched.
Given that we’ve now chalked up our millionth hit, perhaps this statement should now read:
Because we are professionals ourselves, we know what it’s like, and we have our ear to the ground for the latest gossip and news you won’t hear anywhere else. So beware: you are being watched and so are we.
Send the Firm Spy your news and views!
Related posts
- Sticking it to Minter Ellison; Xmas in July Morale Mission Falls Flat Our friends inside Minter Ellison have repeatedly told us in...
- Mid Tier & Boutique Law Firm Graduate Intake Statistics According to Wikipedia, there are 33 Australian universtities offering law...
- 2009 Firm Spy Corporate Firm of the Year - Freehills After a long year of denigrating major Australian corporate firms...
- A Female Wasteland; Alarming Big4 Accounting Firm Partnership Statistics We often hear how among corporate law firms, there...
- Law Firm Graduate Intake Statistics 2009 Thanks to the AFR (3/7) for the following statistics of...



Loading...
Although I don’t always agree with viciousness of your site, keep on keeping the bastards honest
There’s no such thing as a part-time business owner. You either are a business owner or you aren’t. There isn’t a gossip blog for the micro-business operators around the place who work longer hours than partners of law firms for a tiny fraction of the reward. Think the local baker or newsagent gets to switch off? Think they make $1.5m a year either? There are plenty of options available to lawyers of all kinds in Australia. BUT they can’t all involve earning a zillion dollars without working hard and making tough life choices. Make the choice that suits you, simple as that. And if you don’t like the choice you made, change your mind. Just be prepared to take home less coin. It isn’t cut throat, it’s realistic.
Thx for the entertainment FS!
The hostile and generalist views published by this site in respect of partners are no more relevant today than when you first commenced operating
Keep up the good work FS. As Ace implied, someone had to fill the void the Democrats left…
@ Irrelevant
surely your visit to the site today goes to relevance?
[…] FirmSpy excerpted a few parts from this year’s AFR (Law) Partnership Survey. The first one caught my eye: Third year Maquarie University law student Tanja Maley says she hopes to become a partner in a top commercial firm, and everything else – family included – can follow. “I want a fast city life and I want the long hours”, she says. “I don’t think I’d be satisfied if I wasn’t challenged in that respect.” […]
Completely agree with what Relevant said.
It is obvious from the comments posted on this site over the past 12 months that partners, HR staff and senior law firm management monitor this blog - so you guys must be doing something right.
Keep it up.
Would love to see where Tanja Maley ends up in 5, 10 and 15 years.
She might even be unlucky enough to get what she wishes for!
Oh yeah, thanks to Firm Spy for creating such an interesting site. Sure, there’s bigger issues in this world than how much Senior Associates get paid, but there’s nothing like hearing my peers at the “prestige” firms whinging and moaning!
Thanks FS especially for your recent post about Michael Kuzilny and links to his acting on youtube
This comment is in reference to Lawyer above - doesn’t your comment about there being “no such thing” as a part time business owner go directly to the point FS is labouring? Namely, that all top firms would have grads and those sitting outside it believe that part-time partnership is a real prospect, when the opposite is true. The transparency that this forum provides is a great asset to graduates and new lawyers (like me) who want to know sooner rather than later exactly what they’re signing up for. And as you’ve just shown, we can’t rely on what the firms tell us
You guys wouldn’t happen to be affiliated with the Fin Review, would you? All this sucking up to the “excellent” journalism done there is starting to sound a bit suspicious.
You have definitely succeeded in your goal to inform and enlighten naive law students of the reality of the legal industry and practice. Keep up the good work!
If university students are smart, they will not become lawyers. You get no thanks from your clients, you work long hours, you get little remuneration for the long hours in return, the laws change every 5 minutes and you have to be up to date. If you walk out the door at 5pm then you are frowned upon from your colleagues. You don’t have a life! Stay away from big law firms as they treat you like mushrooms and feed you bs and keep you in the dark. They spit you out and chew you up when you are burnt out! Go work in a shop or a cafe on the beach in the Greek Islands and live a little!