Two days ago the Firm Spy commented on the sick timing of Minter Ellison’s decision to publicise its alumni network
Well, in an effort to dig the firm out of this mess, it appears Bowden has contacted The New Lawyer to try to place a positive spin on our report. Instead, Kerrie Bowden has mired Minter Ellison in an even more scandalous situation.
In an excellent news story from The New Lawyer, Kerrie Bowden revealed:
the firm was holding a number of vacant lawyer positions… the firm is looking for five lawyers… property vacancies appear despite recent redundancies made in that area.
Vacancies? Where there were redundancies one week ago?
As noted by the Commonwealth Workplace Authority:
Redundancy is when an employer decides an employee’s job isn’t needed to be done by anyone. The job, not the employee, becomes redundant.
Do the ‘redundant’ lawyers have a claim for unfair dismissal?
If Minter Ellison is unable to correctly implement redundancies in its own office, how can it possibly propose to advise on the implementation of redundancies in the wider community?
Send the Firm Spy your news and views!
Loading...







this is quite a serious f*ck up
Clearly it sucks that these people have lost their jobs, but I think the point that the New Lawyer has missed is that the redundancies weren’t out the Perth office, and that’s where the firm appears to be recruiting…