Burgess v Corrs Chambers Westgarth: Prepare For Brutal Litigation Trench Warfare

Corrs partners prepare for war
Last week we exclusively reported that Corrs Chambers Westgarth is embroiled in an ugly spat involving former graduate at the firm, Ms Louise Burgess.

Ms Burgess’ application alleges unlawful discrimination and workplace bullying by a Corrs HR manager and includes a prayer for relief in the order of $500,000. That’s right – half a mil! In the last week, most of our readers will have seen the massive media coverage of the Styles v Clayton Utz saga. The AFR today referred to it as “Clutz’s lingering PR Headache” and wrote about the lengths the firm has gone to in an effort to keep the matter out of the public eye. At the opening of the trial, one of the barristers representing Clutz asked for a non-publication order, also requesting that the whole Styles v Clutz trial be held in closed court.

It shouldn’t come as a surprise, then, that the Corrs PR machine is warming its engines. Here is a comment we received yesterday:

The “guilty until proven innocent” aspect of this website is slightly ironic, for a bunch of lawyers. There’s a lot of bashing of anyone who doesn’t toe the “lawyers good, firms bad” line.

Ok, I work at Corrs, but it’s odd to me that a claim is made for bullying by an HR staffer without any reference to the actions of the partners and lawyers who supervised the grad in question. HR can be irritating, at times obnoxious, generally unhelpful, aligned with partners’ rather than staff’s interests, but bullying to the point of forcing stress leave? How?

I’ll try to keep an open mind, but on the available facts I’m slightly doubtful as to whether this case has got legs. If Corrs thought it had merit, I’m pretty sure they would have paid for it to go away…

Guilty until proven innocent line? Not really, comrade, we just know what law firms are like to work at. They’re probably all guilty of something. But to prove we’re reasonable, here’s another comment we received which we could have declined to publish if we were truly as partisan in these matters as you allege:

Before you are too quick to jump on Corrs, Ms Burgess has form. She previously worked for and sued another Brisbane law firm (Porter Davies). Apparently, they paid her about $4k just to go away. In that matter she had two complaints. Firstly, that the other secretaries were ‘whispering’ about her and that the partners did nothing to stop it. Secondly, that she overhead two male solicitors talking in one of their offices (through a closed door) and was offended by the content of the conversation. Sounds to me just like another blatant grab for cash. Now that it has hit the papers, I can’t see Corrs has anything left to gain by settling. I foresee a brutal litigation trench war.

We foresee more Fairfax newspaper articles. We also foresee less junior corporate workers standing for the workplace treatment of yesteryear.
Send the Firm Spy your news and views!

VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 4.3/5 (6 votes cast)
VN:F [1.9.13_1145]
Rating: 0 (from 8 votes)
Burgess v Corrs Chambers Westgarth: Prepare For Brutal Litigation Trench Warfare, 4.3 out of 5 based on 6 ratings