Reading between the lines, it looks like Mr Carrington already has the binoculars out too:
“In the next three to five to 10 years most Australian, certainly the larger law firms, and I would include in that category now the global firms, will be looking beyond our immediate boundaries to source work… I suspect we will see the arrival of more global firms, whether they be US or UK based, or both. We’ll see some major firms change their branding”
(John Carrington, AFR 2011 Legal Conference, March 31 2011).
Well, there can be little doubt that Blake Dawson is a major firm that would benefit from a change in branding, but is the firm an appropriate and realistic vehicle for the arrival of another global firm? Let’s have a look.
Blake Dawson Historical Revenue Performance
FY2005/2006: $305million
FY 2006/2007: $337million
FY: 2007/2008: $370million
FY: 2008/2009: $368million
FY: 2009/2010: $359million
Estimated Blake Dawson Historical Profit Performance
FY2005/2006: $110million (36%)
FY 2006/2007: $131million (39%)
FY: 2007/2008: $148million (40%)
FY: 2008/2009: $136million (37%)
FY: 2009/2010: $147million (41%)
In the last year, Blake Dawson has done an excellent job of quarantining profits from declining revenue. We know that high profitability is a major consideration for potential suitors, but the recent history of declining revenue is likely to be a source of concern for those wishing to merge with Blakes. The downbeat comments made by the firm’s CEP John Carrington to the AFR (29/4) aren’t likely to help matters either:
Blake Dawson managing partner John Carrington said there was no question larger firms had faced challenges retaining market share in recent years. “I think this will continue. There is also no doubt that the ability to generate revenue and profits through increased fee rates will be under continuing pressure as well,” he said.
But don’t international firms want less competitive pressure? One thing they’re certain to want is a firm with up-to-date technology and this is where the trouble apparently starts for Blakes. According to an anonymous Blakes secretary, an allegedly highly confidential memo apparently from partnership level contained the following comment:
5 years ago, Blake Dawson was highly regarded for its technology legal practice and internal computer systems. Both are now left wanting. My computer screen is still fuzzy, my secretary’s computer sometimes sounds like a hair dryer and our new printer is as slow as the old one.
A person purporting to be a Blakes IT insider later emailed us clarifying the situation:
The noisy computers are a faulty sensor in our crappy Lenovo desktops. It makes the fans spin fast. Doesnt happen as much anymore. The fuzzy monitor is actually Lenovo’s fault too. This is old news. They sold us a monitor that didn’t match well with our model of laptop. The resolution is terrible. You would think that a company like Lenovo would get that right.
Or that a law firm would sue the company. Or that the law firm would replace substandard technology. Or that Blake Dawson is a homosexual porn star err… an insolent child singer/actor … a technotronic law firm.
Send the Firm Spy your news and views!
Loading...









Based on my experience, I must disagree with your assessment of Blakes’ technology.
I have clerked at five firms over the past three years and found Blakes to have the best technology and the most developed IT practices out of all of them. Everything worked perfectly, although it was annoying to enter a billing code EVERY time you printed something.
Otherwise, the computers, phones and printers were all well-integrated, labelled and easy to use, with instructions in case things went wrong.
When my computer wouldn’t load my personal settings on one occasion I got help from tech support (interstate) by telephone and they resolved the issue in under 5 minutes (although, it was an IT problem, not my fault).
Would be interesting to see what happens if Blakes mergers with a US/UK firm. I doubt whether any of the magic circle/big law would be that interested, though.
It will be interesting to see what happens. Blake Dawson is significantly smaller than the other Big Six firms, so a merger may really boost their standing and help them compete.
Err, what? I thought the IT problems were old news, and this seems like a strange place to mention them in any case.